Cost Savings Cases

Merck Philippines: Evaluating COOLNOMIX Energy Savings in a Commercial VRF System

A JLL Pilot Demonstrating the Potential for Reduced Compressor Electricity Consumption. This original narrative presents the reported measurements, published adjusted figures, tariff revaluations and practical implications for Philippine commercial facility owners.

Project Background & Measured Results

JLL Pilot Evaluation

Commercial VRF System at Merck Philippines

In a published JLL evaluation presentation (dated April 25, 2023), COOLNOMIX technology was assessed on a commercial VRF installation at Merck Philippines. Baseline measurements ran from April 26 to May 26, 2022, and trial measurements ran from March 3 to March 31, 2023. Because the baseline and trial periods were not simultaneous, seasonal weather, operating schedules, building occupancy and equipment loading are essential considerations when interpreting the data.

Industry
Pharmaceutical / Commercial Office
Country
Philippines
Equipment Scope
43 VRF indoor units, 8 outdoor compressors
Device Quantity
8 AC-01 units (per COOLNOMIX management confirmation)
Reporting Source
JLL pilot presentation (internal compliance record)
Measurement Basis
Direct submetered compressor electricity (kWh/day)
MeasurementResult
Baseline compressor consumption3,311 kWh/day
Trial compressor consumption2,822 kWh/day
Difference489 kWh/day
Direct meter-to-meter reduction14.77%
Published adjusted result (0.70 factor)21.1%

Formula: (3,311 − 2,822) / 3,311 × 100 = 14.769% (~14.77%). The published 21.1% uses a 0.70 adjustment factor; the technical justification for that factor was not independently established in the presentation.

Reported Pilot Statistics
8
AC-01 units installed
8
Outdoor compressors
43
VRF indoor units
3,311
Baseline kWh/day
2,822
Trial kWh/day
14.77%
Direct reduction
129,096
Annual kWh saved (reported)
₱1,257,933
Annual cost saved (reported)
Reported Annual Benefits:
• Implied historical electricity tariff: ₱9.7442/kWh (₱1,257,933 ÷ 129,096 kWh)
• Presentation-reported expected payback: < 9 months (reported estimate)
• Presentation-reported annual CO₂ reduction: 84 metric tons (reported estimate)

Note: The payback and carbon figures are manufacturer-presentation estimates, not independently audited outcomes. Merck's actual purchase price is not documented and cannot be inferred.

Electricity Tariff Comparison: Historical vs. Planning Tariff

The financial value of verified electricity savings increases when avoidable electricity tariffs rise. A cooling system that saves the exact same physical kilowatt-hours delivers greater peso savings under modern utility rates.

Historical Implied Rate (2022–2023)
₱9.7442 / kWh
Reported annual energy saved
129,096 kWh
Historical reported cost savings
₱1,257,933 / yr
Derived from
₱1,257,933 ÷ 129,096 kWh
Illustrative Planning Rate (Current Baseline)
₱13.50 / kWh
Same annual energy saved
129,096 kWh
Illustrative annual value
₱1,742,796 / yr
Additional annual value
+₱484,863 / yr (+38.54%)
Important Disclaimer: ₱13.50/kWh is an illustrative planning assumption, not a verified current Merck tariff. Continued Merck energy savings have not been independently verified by CoolIndoors. The historical reported 129,096 kWh must not be confused with the separately modeled 129,105 kWh annualization (3,311 kWh/day × 22 days/mo × 12 mo × 14.77%) used in the reference calculator.

What Can Philippine Facility Owners Learn from This Case?

Measure Compressors Separately

Cooling savings occur at the compressor. Whole-building meters dilute cooling optimization signals; submetering eligible equipment provides clear verification.

Energy vs. Financial Metrics

Kilowatt-hours saved is the physical performance metric. Financial savings depend on the avoidable tariff at the time electricity is saved.

Tariff Leverage

As Philippine electricity tariffs rise, the peso value of every verified kilowatt-hour saved increases without requiring additional capital investment.

Pilots De-Risk Decisions

A 14–28 day baseline followed by a 14–28 day trial provides facility-specific data before committing to multi-building or portfolio-wide capital expenditure.

Device Count ≠ Indoor Units

At Merck, 43 VRF indoor units were served by eight compressors and eight AC-01 devices. Device quantity requires compressor-connector technical review.

Direct vs. Adjusted Results

Management should always distinguish direct unadjusted meter readings (14.77%) from adjusted figures (21.1%) and evaluate the technical justification.

Ready to evaluate your facility's cooling equipment against these benchmarks?

All Case Studies

Pharmaceutical / Commercial OfficePhilippines

Merck Philippines (JLL Commercial VRF Pilot)

Equipment
VRF system — 43 indoor units, 8 outdoor compressors, 8 AC-01 devices
Date
Baseline: Apr 26–May 26, 2022 | Trial: Mar 3–31, 2023 | Presentation: 25 Apr 2023
Reported savings
14.77% direct meter-to-meter | 21.1% published adjusted
Measurement basis
Meter-to-meter compressor electricity: 3,311 kWh/day baseline → 2,822 kWh/day trial

A published pilot evaluation of eight COOLNOMIX AC-01 devices on a commercial VRF system. Direct meter-to-meter compressor consumption dropped from 3,311 to 2,822 kWh/day (489 kWh/day reduction, 14.77%). The manufacturer's presentation also published an adjusted figure of 21.1% using a 0.70 factor, for which the technical basis has not been independently established.

Source: Reported in JLL pilot evaluation presentation for Merck Philippines
Commercial Offices

Additional office-sector case summaries will be published as formal publication rights, customer permissions and source materials are confirmed.

Hotels & Hospitality

Additional hotel-sector case summaries will be published as publication rights and source materials are confirmed.

Retail & Supermarkets

Additional retail-sector case summaries will be published as publication rights and source materials are confirmed.

Manufacturing

Additional manufacturing-sector case summaries will be published as publication rights and source materials are confirmed.

Cold Storage

Additional cold-storage case summaries will be published as publication rights and source materials are confirmed.

Case summaries use original wording and link to source materials. CoolIndoors does not reproduce third-party customer logos or copyrighted reports without permission. Savings figures are project-specific and do not constitute a guarantee of performance in other facilities.